
The demand for electric vehicles in France is surging. Recent data highlights this growth for EV owners:
- Battery electric car sales rose by 138%.
- Plug-in hybrid sales increased by an impressive 486%.
For residents, this shift makes home charging essential. The ‘droit à la prise’ is a legal right enabling the installation of a personal charging station. It is a key tool in the effort to Convince Landlord or an HOA. Residents can move beyond tragbare ev-ladegeräte to permanent EV-Ladelösungen. Hersteller von EV-Ladegeräten like TPSON, a technologically advanced electric vehicle charging solution provider, simplify the installation of an EV-Ladegerät.
Your Legal Right: The ‘Droit à la Prise’ Explained
The ‘droit à la prise’, or ‘right to a plug’, is a powerful legal provision for French residents. It empowers individuals to request the installation of a charging point for their electric vehicle in a shared parking facility. This right is not a negotiation; it is a legal entitlement. Understanding its principles is the first step toward securing a personal charging solution.
What is the ‘Droit à la Prise’?
The ‘droit à la prise’ provides a clear pathway for obtaining a home charging station. It defines the responsibilities and rights of all parties involved.
A Legally Protected Right
This right is enshrined in French law. It gives a tenant or co-owner the authority to carry out the necessary work for their charging needs. A landlord or homeowners’ association (HOA) cannot refuse a request without legitimate, legally defined reasons.
Installation at Your Expense
The person making the request bears the full cost of the project. This includes the purchase of the charging equipment and the complete installation. Technologically advanced providers like TPSON offer various solutions to fit different budgets and technical requirements.
For Personal Use Only
The installed charging station is for the exclusive use of the individual who requested it. The equipment connects to their personal electricity meter or a dedicated sub-meter, ensuring they are billed directly for their consumption.
Who Qualifies for This Right?
The law specifies which residents can exercise this right. Eligibility extends to most people living in buildings with shared parking.
Tenants in Multi-Unit Buildings
A tenant with a designated parking space can invoke their ‘droit à la prise’. They must notify their landlord, who then forwards the request to the building’s HOA or ‘homeowners’ association management body’.
Co-owners in Condominiums
A co-owner in a condominium can directly notify their HOA of their intent to install a charging station. The process for co-owners is more direct than for tenants. This right applies to both indoor and outdoor parking spaces within the condominium.
Key Exclusions and Limitations
Wichtiger Hinweis: The right may not apply if the condominium building has already voted to install a collective charging solution or if a pre-existing system is already in place. Technical impossibility, though rare, is another potential ground for refusal.
The Legal Framework
Two key pieces of legislation form the foundation of the ‘droit à la prise’. They provide the legal weight behind every request.
Law of July 10, 1965
This law governs condominiums in France. It establishes the basic rules for managing common areas. Amendments to this law have progressively integrated the right to individual charging solutions.
Decree of December 25, 2020
This decree significantly strengthened and clarified the ‘droit à la prise’. It streamlined the notification procedure and reduced the timeframe for an HOA to object. The decree makes the installation process faster and more certain for electric vehicle owners.
How to Convince Landlord: A Tenant’s Step-by-Step Guide

A tenant’s path to securing a personal EV charger involves a formal, legally defined procedure. The goal is not to convince landlord through persuasion but to correctly execute a legal right. This guide outlines the precise steps a tenant must follow. Success depends on meticulous preparation and adherence to the legal process.
Step 1: Prepare Your Formal Notification
A strong start is essential. A tenant must gather all necessary information and documents before contacting their landlord. This preparation demonstrates seriousness and ensures the request is legally compliant from day one.
The Registered Letter Requirement
The entire process begins with a formal written notice. French law requires this notification to be sent via a registered letter with acknowledgment of receipt. This method provides indisputable proof of the date the landlord received the request, which starts a legal timeline.
What to Include in Your Letter
The letter must contain a comprehensive description of the planned work. A tenant should clearly state their intention to exercise their ‘droit à la prise’. Key details to include are:
- A detailed description of the proposed installation work.
- The make and model of the chosen charging station.
- The name of the certified installer who will perform the work.
- A technical plan or diagram of the installation.
Suche nach einem qualifizierten Installateur
A tenant must hire an installer with an “Infrastructure for Recharging Electric Vehicles” (IRVE) certification. This qualification is mandatory for such work. It ensures the installation meets all safety standards and is a prerequisite for receiving financial aid. Technologically advanced providers like TPSON can often recommend certified professionals for their charging equipment.
Creating an Installation Diagram
A clear diagram is a critical component of the notification. This technical plan, prepared by the IRVE installer, shows the proposed location of the charging station. It also maps the path of the electrical cabling from the common electrical panel to the tenant’s parking space. This visual aid helps the landlord and HOA understand the project’s scope.
Step 2: Notifying Your Landlord
With the complete file prepared, the next step is to formally inform the property owner. This action officially starts the legal process to convince landlord and the HOA to approve the project.
Sending the ‘Lettre Recommandée’
The tenant sends the full notification package to their landlord via registered letter with acknowledgment of receipt. This package must include the descriptive letter, the installer’s quote, and the installation diagram. Sending the letter initiates the landlord’s legal obligations.
The Importance of Acknowledgment
The acknowledgment of receipt (acknowledgment of receipt) is the tenant’s proof. It confirms the exact date the landlord received the request. This date is the starting point for the one-month deadline the landlord has to act. A tenant should keep this receipt in a safe place.
Step 3: The Landlord’s Legal Duty
Upon receiving the notification, the landlord has specific, time-sensitive responsibilities. The landlord acts as an intermediary between the tenant and the building’s homeowners’ association (HOA), or ‘syndic’.
The One-Month Forwarding Deadline
The law gives the landlord one month from the date of receipt to forward the tenant’s complete request to the HOA. The landlord must send the file to the syndic using the same method: a registered letter with acknowledgment of receipt. This step is a legal duty, not an option.
What if the Landlord Fails to Act?
If the landlord does not forward the request within the one-month period, the tenant gains the right to act directly. The tenant can then send the notification directly to the HOA. They should include a copy of the original registered letter and the receipt proving the landlord missed the deadline. This ensures a non-responsive landlord cannot block the charging station request.
Step 4: The HOA’s (Syndic’s) Role
The homeowners’ association, managed by the syndic, plays a pivotal role after the landlord forwards the request. The syndic does not have the power to approve or deny the project. Instead, its function is purely administrative. The syndic ensures the process follows legal timelines and informs all relevant parties. A tenant’s effort to convince landlord is now a formal matter for the HOA to process.
Receiving the Request
The syndic officially receives the tenant’s project file from the landlord. This file includes the detailed work description, the installer’s quote, and the technical diagram. The syndic’s receipt of this registered letter marks a new critical date. This date starts the clock on the HOA’s three-month response window. The syndic must add the tenant’s notification to the agenda of the next general assembly meeting for informational purposes.
The Three-Month Response Window
The law provides a strict three-month period for the HOA to respond. During this time, the syndic can only object to the installation on very specific, legitimate grounds. An objection is a serious legal step. It requires the HOA to formally file a case with the judicial tribunal (tribunal judiciaire).
Important Legal Point: The HOA cannot simply vote “no” or send a letter of refusal. A formal legal challenge is the only valid form of objection. If the HOA misses this three-month deadline, the tenant automatically gains the right to proceed with the installation.
The syndic must manage this timeline carefully. The landlord and tenant depend on the syndic’s diligence.
Informing Other Co-owners
A key duty for the syndic is to inform all other co-owners about the proposed charging installation. The syndic typically does this by adding the topic to the agenda of the next general meeting (general meeting).
- Zweck: The agenda item is for “information,” not for a “vote.”
- Action: Co-owners review the project details. They cannot vote to block the individual’s right.
- Outcome: This step ensures transparency within the condominium. It also allows the syndic to present any potential collective charging solutions that could override the individual request.
This communication is a crucial part of the process. It keeps the community informed while respecting the tenant’s legal right to their personal charging station.
A Co-Owner’s Guide to the Installation of Charging Stations
For co-owners in French condominiums, the process of exercising the ‘droit à la prise’ is more direct than for tenants. A co-owner communicates directly with the homeowners’ association (HOA), or syndic, eliminating the landlord as an intermediary. This streamlined path requires careful preparation to ensure a smooth and successful installation of charging points.
Step 1: Prepare Your Project Details
A co-owner must assemble a complete and professional project file before notifying the syndic. This preparation is the foundation for a successful outcome. It demonstrates a serious and well-researched intent to proceed.
Choosing Your Charging Station
The first decision involves selecting the right equipment. A co-owner should consider their vehicle’s charging capacity, their daily driving habits, and their budget. Technologically advanced providers like TPSON offer a wide variety of models. Die purchase price for a charging station for electric cars varies by power output.
| Typ der Ladestation | Purchase Price Range (EUR) |
|---|---|
| 7 kW | €400 – €1,200 |
| 22 kW | €700 – €1,500 |
This table provides a general cost estimate for the unit itself, excluding installation.
Obtaining a Quote and Technical Plan
A co-owner must engage a certified “Infrastructure for Recharging Electric Vehicles” (IRVE) installer. This professional will assess the site and provide two essential documents:
- A detailed quote outlining the full cost of the installation.
- A technical plan or diagram showing the charger’s location and the electrical wiring route.
These documents form the core of the formal notification.
Understanding Power Connection Options
The IRVE installer will also determine the best way to connect the charger to the building’s power. A qualified electrician must first assess the condominium’s electrical infrastructure. This check confirms if the existing system can support the new load. Several connection methods exist for the installation of an electric charging point.
- Individual Metering: The most common solution involves connecting the charger to the co-owner’s personal electricity meter. If this is not feasible, a dedicated sub-meter is installed. This ensures the co-owner pays only for their own electric consumption.
- Socket Type: The installation of a charging point can use a standard Type 2 socket, which is the universal solution for most electric vehicles. In some cases, a simple reinforced socket in the private parking space may be sufficient for lower-power charging needs.
Step 2: Notify the HOA (Syndic) Directly
With a complete project file, the co-owner can officially begin the legal process. This step involves direct and formal communication with the condominium management.
Drafting the Registered Letter
The co-owner must draft a formal letter to the syndic. This letter is a notification of intent, not a request for permission. It should clearly state the co-owner’s plan to exercise their ‘droit à la prise’. The letter must be sent via registered mail with acknowledgment of receipt (registered letter with acknowledgment of receipt) to create a legal record of the notification date.
Essential Documents to Attach
The registered letter is incomplete without the supporting documents. The co-owner must include the entire project file to provide the syndic with all necessary information.
Checklist of Attachments:
- A detailed description of the planned work.
- The technical plan and diagram from the IRVE installer.
- The formal quote for the complete project.
This complete package ensures the notification is legally compliant.
Step 3: The HOA’s Response and Timeline
Once the syndic receives the notification, a strict legal timeline begins. The syndic’s role is primarily administrative. It must process the notification according to the law governing condominiums.
The Three-Month Objection Period
The law gives the HOA a three-month period to object to the installation of charging stations. An objection cannot be a simple refusal. The HOA must have a legitimate, legally defined reason, such as a pre-existing plan for a collective charging solution. To formalize the objection, the syndic must file a case with the judicial tribunal within this three-month window. If the deadline passes without a formal legal challenge, the co-owner automatically wins the right to proceed with the work.
Adding to the General Meeting Agenda
The syndic has a duty to inform all other co-owners of the project. The syndic accomplishes this by adding the notification to the agenda of the next general meeting (general meeting). This step ensures transparency within the community.
‘Information’ vs. ‘Vote’
It is critical to understand the nature of this agenda item. The topic is added for information only, not for a vote. The other co-owners can review the project details, but they cannot vote to approve or deny it. The ‘droit à la prise’ is an individual right. A vote by the general assembly cannot override it. This procedure respects the co-owner’s legal right while keeping the rest of the condominium informed about the upcoming charging installation.
Can Your EV Charger Request Be Refused?
While the ‘droit à la prise’ is a strong legal right, it is not absolute. A homeowners’ association (HOA) can object to a request, but only under very specific and limited circumstances defined by law. Understanding these grounds is crucial for any resident planning an Installation von EV-Ladegeräten.
Legitimate Grounds for Refusal
An HOA can only block a request for three legally recognized reasons. The burden of proof lies entirely with the HOA.
Pre-existing Collective Solution
The HOA can refuse the request if the building already has a collective charging infrastructure. If a shared system is already in place and operational for residents to use, the individual’s right to a personal installation may not apply.
Planned Future Collective Installation
An HOA can also object if it has formally decided to implement a building-wide collective installation.
Important Condition: The HOA must have officially voted on this collective project vor the resident submitted their individual request. The work for this collective solution must also be scheduled to begin within a reasonable timeframe.
Proven Technical Impossibility
This is the rarest reason for refusal. The HOA must provide a detailed technical report from a qualified expert. The report must prove that the building’s electrical system or structure cannot support any new charging connection, even after potential upgrades.
Illegitimate Reasons for Refusal
Many common objections from an HOA are not legally valid. A resident should not accept a refusal based on these illegitimate claims.
Cost Concerns for the HOA
The individual requesting the charger bears all costs. Therefore, the HOA cannot use financial impact on the condominium as a reason for refusal. The project has no direct cost to the other co-owners.
Aesthetic Objections
Concerns about the appearance of the charging station or its wiring are not a valid legal basis for an objection. The ‘droit à la prise’ prioritizes the need for EV charging over aesthetic preferences.
Lack of General Interest
The right to a plug is an individual right. An HOA cannot deny a request simply because other residents do not need or want a personal charging station. A lack of majority interest is irrelevant.
The Formal Objection Process
An HOA cannot simply say “no.” It must follow a strict legal procedure to voice its objection.
The HOA’s Three-Month Deadline
From the moment the syndic receives the complete request, the HOA has three months to act. This period is for the HOA to either accept the project or formally challenge it in court.
Requirement to File in Court
A simple letter of refusal is not a valid objection. To formally object, the syndic, acting on behalf of the HOA, must file a case with the judicial tribunal (tribunal judiciaire). This is the only legitimate way to challenge the request.
Consequences of a Missed Deadline
If the HOA fails to file a case in court within the three-month window, the resident automatically wins the right to proceed. The silence of the HOA is legally considered an approval. The resident can then begin the work as described in their notification.
How to Contest an Unjust Refusal
A resident who receives an unjust refusal from their homeowners’ association (HOA) has a clear legal path forward. The ‘droit à la prise’ protects the resident, and an illegitimate objection does not end the process. The resident can challenge the HOA’s decision in court. This action ensures that the law, not unfounded concerns, determines the outcome.
Consulting a Legal Expert
Facing a formal objection from an HOA requires a strategic response. A resident should immediately seek advice from a legal expert, such as an lawyer specializing in real estate or condominium law. This professional provides essential guidance and support.
A legal expert performs several key functions:
- Reviews the Objection: The expert analyzes the HOA’s refusal to determine if it has any legal merit.
- Verifies Compliance: They check if the HOA followed the correct legal procedure, including filing the objection with the court within the three-month deadline.
- Prepares the Case: The expert helps the resident gather all necessary documentation, including the original notification, the project details for their chosen TPSON charger, and correspondence with the syndic.
- Represents the Resident: The lawyer will represent the resident’s interests in all legal proceedings.
Profi-Tipp: Engaging a legal expert early demonstrates a resident’s commitment to enforcing their rights. It often signals to the HOA that the resident will not back down from an unlawful refusal.
The Role of the Judicial Tribunal
The judicial tribunal (tribunal judiciaire) is the legal authority that resolves disputes between a resident and their HOA. When an HOA files a formal objection, this court becomes the decision-maker. The tribunal does not conduct a vote or survey opinions; it applies the law to the facts of the case.
The tribunal’s role is to examine the evidence presented by both sides. It will specifically assess whether the HOA’s objection is based on one of the few legitimate grounds for refusal. The judge will review the technical plans, the building’s status, and any plans for collective solutions. If the court finds the HOA’s objection to be unfounded, it will rule in favor of the resident. The tribunal’s decision is legally binding. A favorable ruling effectively dismisses the HOA’s objection, granting the resident the definitive right to proceed with the installation of their charging station.
Individual vs. Collective Charging Points in Condominiums

Residents in French condominiums face a choice between two paths for electric vehicle charging: an individual approach or a collective one. Each method has distinct advantages, processes, and financial implications. Understanding this choice is key to developing the right strategy for a condominium building.
The Individual Approach: Your ‘Droit à la Prise’
The ‘droit à la prise’ empowers a single resident. It is a direct and legally protected route to securing a personal charging station. This approach focuses on individual needs over community consensus.
Pros: Speed and Control
The primary benefit is speed. A resident does not need to wait for a general meeting vote. They control the entire process, from selecting a technologically advanced TPSON charger to scheduling the installation. This individual right to install ensures a quick resolution for their charging needs.
Cons: Full Financial Responsibility
The main drawback is cost. The resident who makes the request is responsible for 100% of the expenses. This includes the equipment, the work of the certified installer, and any necessary metering hardware.
The Collective Approach: A Building-Wide Solution
A collective solution aims to equip the entire building’s parking area. This forward-thinking approach treats EV charging as a building utility, similar to lighting or internet access. It is a comprehensive strategy for condominiums.
Pros: Shared Costs and Future-Proofing
A collective project spreads the cost across the condominium or among participating residents. This often makes it more affordable per person than installing individual charging points. A collective installation also future-proofs the building, preparing the electrical infrastructure for growing demand.
Cons: Requires a Majority Vote
The main obstacle is the requirement for a vote. A collective project must be approved by a majority of co-owners at a general meeting. This process can be slow and is subject to delays and debate.
Proposing a Collective Solution
Any co-owner or the syndic can propose a collective charging project. The proposal must be added to the agenda of a general meeting. A successful proposal requires convincing a majority of the benefits of a shared, collective system.
When a Collective Solution Overrides Your Right
An individual’s ‘droit à la prise’ is powerful but not absolute. A decision by the condominium to pursue a collective solution can take precedence.
Impact of a Voted Collective Project
If the condominium has already voted to implement a collective charging system, the syndic can legitimately object to an individual request. The existence of a formal collective plan supersedes the individual’s right. This prevents redundant or conflicting work within the building.
Timelines for Collective Implementation
An HOA cannot use a vague future plan to block a request. For a collective project to be a valid reason for refusal, the work must be planned to start within a reasonable timeframe after the vote. This ensures the collective solution is a genuine project, not just a tactic to delay individual requests.
Financing the Installation for Your Electric Cars
Financial aid programs significantly reduce the cost of installing a home charger for electric cars. Residents can access several national subsidies to make charging their car more affordable. These programs support both individual and collective projects for cars.
The Advenir Program: Your Primary Subsidy
The Advenir program is a key financial incentive for EV charging infrastructure. It provides direct subsidies for the purchase and installation of charging points for cars.
Subsidy for Individual Installations
A resident exercising their ‘droit à la prise’ can receive a subsidy covering 50% of the cost. The aid is capped at €960 per charging point for a single car. This makes the project much more accessible for the owner of the car.
Subsidy for Collective Projects
The Advenir program offers even more attractive aid for collective solutions in a condominium. A collective project can receive a subsidy covering 50% of the cost, with a cap of up to €1,660 per charging point. This encourages a condominium to invest in shared infrastructure for multiple cars.
Zuschussfähigkeit und Antragsverfahren
Anmerkung: The certified IRVE installer manages the Advenir application on behalf of the car owner. The subsidy is deducted directly from the final invoice, simplifying the process for the owner of the car.
The Tax Credit (Crédit d’Impôt)
A tax credit for acquiring a charging system provides another layer of financial support. This credit applies to a primary or secondary residence for the owner of the car.
Percentage of Costs Covered
The tax credit covers 75% of the total cost. This includes the price of the equipment and the installation labor for the car owner. Technologically advanced providers like TPSON offer solutions that qualify for this credit.
Financial Cap per Person
The credit is capped at €300 per charging system. This limit applies per person, so a couple can claim up to €600 for two separate charging points for their cars. This is a significant benefit for households with multiple cars.
How to Claim on Your Tax Return
A resident claims the credit when filing their annual income tax return. They must declare the expense and keep the invoice from the installer as proof for their car.
Reduced VAT Rate
A reduced Value-Added Tax (VAT) rate lowers the overall project cost for many cars. This tax benefit applies to specific types of properties and work.
Understanding the 5.5% VAT
The standard VAT rate of 20% is reduced to 5.5% for the supply and installation of EV charging equipment. This applies to work done in residential buildings, including condominiums, that are more than two years old.
Which Work Qualifies?
The reduced rate applies to the entire project. This includes the charging station itself and all labor costs for the installation. This benefit makes charging solutions more affordable for owners of cars in older condominiums. The collective benefit for cars is substantial.
Local and Regional Aid
National programs provide a strong financial foundation for EV charger installations. Many cities and regions in France offer additional local aid. These programs often complement national subsidies, further reducing costs for residents. They can make a significant difference, especially for larger collective projects.
Examples: Paris and Normandy Region
Different regions have unique approaches to promoting electric mobility. Paris and the Normandy region offer excellent examples of local support.
The city of Paris provides specific subsidies for condominiums. It supports the pre-cabling of parking areas for future charging needs. This aid targets collective infrastructure, covering a percentage of the work. The goal is to prepare buildings for a future where every parking space may need a charger. This type of collective investment is highly encouraged.
The Normandy region also has a robust program. It offers grants to individuals, businesses, and local authorities. The aid often focuses on encouraging collective installations. This regional support makes a collective project a more financially viable option for many co-owners.
How to Find Local Subsidies
Finding local aid requires some proactive research. The availability and terms of these programs change. Residents should check for the most current information. A technologically advanced provider like TPSON can sometimes offer guidance on local incentives for their charging solutions. Here are key resources for finding subsidies:
- Official City Websites (
town hall): A resident’s local town hall website is the best starting point. Search for terms like “charging station subsidy” or “electric vehicle aid”. - Regional Council Websites (
Conseil Régional): The regional government site details broader programs. These often support large-scale collective projects. - Local Energy Agencies: Organizations like ALEC (Agence Locale de l’Énergie et du Climat) provide specialized advice. They track all available aid for energy-related projects, including EV charging for a car.
- IRVE Installer: A certified installer often knows about local programs. They can inform a car owner about aid that applies to their specific project, whether individual or collective.
These local programs often prioritize collective solutions. They aim to equip entire buildings for the growing number of electric vehicles.
The ‘droit à la prise’ is a legal right, not a negotiation with a landlord. Success depends on following the formal notification procedure with all required details. A landlord and HOA have very specific, limited grounds for refusal. Significant financial aid makes electric vehicle charging more affordable than ever for residents.
Umsetzbarer Tipp: People should begin today by drafting their registered letter and gathering project details to enforce their right to a personal charging solution.
FAQ
What is the ‘droit à la prise’?
The ‘droit à la prise’ is a French legal right. It allows a tenant or co-owner to install a personal EV charging station in a shared parking area. The individual covers all associated costs for the installation.
Can a landlord refuse a tenant’s request?
A landlord cannot personally refuse the request. They have a legal duty to forward the tenant’s complete notification to the building’s homeowners’ association (HOA) within one month. The landlord acts only as an intermediary in this process.
Who pays for the EV charger installation?
The resident exercising their ‘droit à la prise’ pays for the entire project. This includes the charging equipment and all installation work performed by a certified professional. Financial aid programs can help reduce this personal expense significantly.
What is an IRVE installer?
An IRVE installer is a professional certified for installing electric vehicle charging infrastructure in France. Hiring an IRVE-certified installer is a legal requirement. It also ensures the project is eligible for national subsidies like the Advenir program.
How long does the HOA have to object?
The HOA has a strict three-month period to object after receiving the formal notification. An objection is only valid if the HOA files a case with the judicial tribunal (tribunal judiciaire) on legitimate, legally defined grounds.
What happens if the HOA misses its deadline?
If the HOA does not file a formal objection in court within the three-month window, the resident automatically gains the right to proceed. The resident can then begin the installation work as described in their original notification.
Can a resident choose any EV charger?
Yes, a resident can select their preferred charging station. Technologically advanced electric vehicle charging solution providers like TPSON offer various models that meet technical standards and qualify for financial aid, giving residents flexibility and choice for their project.




